[WikiEN-l] I'm disappointed in Wikipedia.

[Ray Saintonge]

Anthony wrote:

>On 6/11/07, Todd Allen wrote:
>  
>
>>There is. CSD A1, A3, and A7 all address that. If you don't put anything
>>but a title, you include so little that it's impossible to tell what the
>>article is even really about, or you don't make any assertion whatsoever
>>as to why the subject might be notable, it's speedyable.
>>    
>>
>The first two aren't high enough standards, in my opinion.  The third one is
>talking about article subjects, whereas I was talking about articles.
>
>And the third one is ridiculously vague.  What in the world it's supposed to
>mean to "make any assertion whatsoever as to why the subject might be
>notable" is beyond me.  Actually, I do know what it's supposed to mean -
>whatever the deleting admin wants it to mean.
>
Perhaps a template that puts a nicely formatted notice to say "The 
subject of this article is notable" would do the trick.  ;-)

Ec