[WikiEN-l] Well, I guess WIKITRUTH *is* an 'attack site' after all...

[Daniel R. Tobias]

On 8 Jun 2007 at 09:05:41 -0400, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:

> How odd. A userid was created yesterday which nominated the Wikitruth
> article for deletion, based on BADSITES, and a bunch of
> none-too-convincing arguments. It's about the most obvious example of
> a straw man nomination I've seen in a while; I hope I am not accused
> of trying to revise history by saying that.

But, it's funny that the same "none-too-convincing arguments" and 
contentious behavior, when MONGO did it, was perfectly all right.  
When I complained about his behavior on AN/I, I was the one who got 
slapped for it, and threatened with blocking for "stalking" MONGO (by 
reverting his edits that I considered vandalism).  Once again, he got 
off totally scot free, without so much as a slap on the wrist.  Once 
again, it's shown that there's an "untouchable" caste here, a clique 
that has a free pass to do what it wishes, censor what it wishes, be 
uncivil to whomever it wishes, and the admins will always side with 
them and against whomever tries to hold them to account for their 
behavior.  Some animals are more equal than others.


-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/