[WikiEN-l] [name of rouge adnim here]

[The Cunctator]

On 6/3/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/3/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> > And as several of us have been saying over and over, the GFDL vio is not
> > "clear" in this case and for much of the material can be rectified with
> > a little more work.
> >
>
> Your problem appears to be that you don't know the GFDL that well.
> Therefor you missed the relivant loophole.


You appear not to know the English language that well, but I'd rather not
get into that. Since insults rarely move a conversation in a positive
direction.

Maybe your interpretations of the GFDL are incorrect. Please search within
yourself for a modicum of humility.