On 7/11/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:46:24 +0100, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And we
/might/ have averted a
lawsuit.
Prove it.
If that's your attitude then we are wasting our time.
You would rather have it phrased as citation needed? One of the basic
parts of logical debate is that you can provide evidence to support
your assertions.
If we waited
for the plaint to arrive before doing anything, we would probably be
knee-deep in lawsuits by now.
The low number experenced by youtube suggests otherwise. Despite a
policy of not doing anything untill the legal complaint arrived there
have been a handful of lawsuits. (Viacom that one from the premiership
that one from utube a few otheres) and that is despite being packed
with copyvios and legaly dubius statements.
Me, I think that our showing we take complaints
seriously is one major
reason we've got by this far without an army of lawyers.
There are a number of different ways to give the appearence of takeing
complaints seriously.
--
geni