[WikiEN-l] The Register decries Wikipedia's "censorship" via OTRS

Phil Boswell phil.boswell at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 20:48:44 UTC 2007

geni wrote:
> On 7/9/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:36:21 +0100, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> >> Step 1: remove the offending material to forestall legal action;
>> >Um I suspect that may be problematical in some situations because it
>> >could be used as admission that there was a problem.
>> Maybe.  But probably not.  Leaving it in despite knowing that it is
>> contested is, in my view, far more likely to result in a real problem.
> Eh that would be an area where I think some general advice from Mike
> Godwin could come in handy
I have this feeling his reply would be very like that of your more
aggressive surgeon: "if in doubt, whip it out". Obviously we have the
advantage over the sawbones that we can if necessary "put it back" without
killing the patient in between.

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/The-Register-decries-Wikipedia%27s-%22censorship%22-via-OTRS-tf4042269.html#a11509541
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list