[WikiEN-l] Fred Bauder"clarifies"on attack site link policy

[Ken Arromdee]

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
> Me, I take a more practical view.  WR has no known editorial process,
> and is a festering den of banned vanity spammers and other
> malcontents.  What they say about Wikipedia has no discernable
> authority, it is a textbook case of an unreliable source.

If WR links were only deleted for not being reliable sources, we wouldn't
be *having* this fuss.  Most of the questionable deletions of WR and similar
links are under circumstances where reliable sources are irrelevant--talk
pages, Wikipedia signpost, etc.