[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy

[The Mangoe]

On 7/6/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> No, because it's a message board with no editorial oversight, run and
> contributed to by various anonymous individuals. Even worse, it is
> filled with fantastic tales of conspiracies and intrigues, 90% of them
> without any factual basis whatsoever, and the other 10% extremely
> slanted views with typically only a vague connection with reality.

So you're saying that Brandt's posts in that thread are falsifications?

I am not going to defend the general level of quality of that
forum.But in the case of that thread, you exaggerate. It seems to me
entirely reasonable to take at face value that it represents Brandt's
reports of what he was doing and the responses he was getting.