[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy

[James Farrar]

On 06/07/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/5/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/5/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Well, it's convenient that they could find another source without
> > > having to link to the WR thread, but it also seems that the thread is
> > > a better source, in spite of the snarky commentary within it.
> >
> > It can't possibly be a "better source", as none of it is reliable.
>
> Not even the almost blow-by-blow transcript from Brandt of his
> communications with the various parties?

No, because it's an attack site, and hence per se unreliable...