[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy

[jayjg]

On 7/5/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/5/07, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> > KM's edit summary n inserting the links was "vague ArbCom statements
> > from 8 months ago aren't policy. that ArbCom case pertained to ED and
> > the links were being used for harassment. this link is genuinely
> > informative."
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essjay_controversy&diff=next&oldid=140406328
> > and on examining what was inserted, no confidential or abusive
> > material was linked to.
>
> Well, it's convenient that they could find another source without
> having to link to the WR thread, but it also seems that the thread is
> a better source, in spite of the snarky commentary within it.

It can't possibly be a "better source", as none of it is reliable.