[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkkkk site link policy

[jayjg]

On 7/4/07, John Lee <johnleemk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/4/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/2/07, John Lee <johnleemk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > What I'm saying is, intentions are good, but by their fruits ye shall
> > know
> > > them. The consistent implementation of this principle you, SlimVirgin
> > and to
> > > a lesser extent Fred Bauder have been advocating has consistently
> > resulted
> > > in abuses.
> >
> > What consistency? One example, quickly contained. As I said, I've seen
> > people doing sweeping removals of links to specific sites for all
> > sorts of reasons, they don't need a strawman policy for justification.
>
>
> One example? I can think of a lot more than just the Teresa Nielsen Hayden
> case. Links to "attack sites" have been removed from the Signpost in the
> past, and people like Dan Tobias have been aggressively highlighting them on
> the list.

The link removal from the Signpost was a bad idea? Just because Dan
Tobias doesn't like something, it doesn't mean it's a bad thing.