[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkkkk site link policy
fredbaud at waterwiki.info
Mon Jul 2 17:23:15 UTC 2007
>From: Kamryn Matika [mailto:kamrynmatika at gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 10:58 AM
>To: 'English Wikipedia'
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
>On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at waterwiki.info> wrote:
>> I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>Why did you endorse my block if this is the case? The block was enacted
>solely on the ruling in the MONGO case and was applied to my reverting to a
>version of a page that contained a reference to Wikipedia Review. If there
>was no arbitration ruling that relates to Wikipedia Review, how is the
>justification for my block valid? Why did you support it?
I didn't read the link right. In this case the link might be fine, although Wikipedia Review is down right now. I don't support broad generalization of the MONGO case. Glad we cleared that up. Maybe we can resolve this. Who is it that thinks someone can be blocked for a link to Wikipedia Review based on the MONGO case?
More information about the WikiEN-l