[WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy

[Vee]

On 02/07/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at waterwiki.info> wrote:
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: The Mangoe [mailto:the.mangoe at gmail.com]
> >Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 08:03 AM
> >To: 'English Wikipedia'
> >Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy
> >
> >On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at waterwiki.info> wrote:
> >> I did originate it though and am not intimidated. I shudder to
> contemplate what
> >> Mr. Goodman wants for Wikipedia. If a pack of dogs fall on someone
> after he and
> >> his ilk are in control, I guess we will simply be obligated to stand by
> and do
> >> nothing.
> >
> >The central problem in all of this is the hyperbole. At worst the
> >WR-ites are a bunch of malcontents whose not always coherent ravings
> >can be ignored by choosing not to visit their site. As a "pack of
> >dogs", they rank right up there in threat with a litter of Pekinese
> >pups.
> >
>
> I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
>
> Fred
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>

sooo... why was the link to wikipedia review removed and why did you endorse
the blocking of the editor who added it, and why did you claim that the
ruling covered the adding of such a link.

you are incredibly inconsistent.