[WikiEN-l] "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources will be ...

[SonOfYoungwood at aol.com]

In a message dated 1/27/2007 1:59:57 PM Central Standard Time,  
bryan.derksen at shaw.ca writes:

> At  this point, there seem to be 2 reasonable alternatives:
> 1) Create a  time limited deletion warning permitting
> deletion upon expiration  without reliable sources.
> 2) Create an indefinite banner that clearly  states that the
> article/section is in a highly unreliable state should  not
> regarded as accurate.

I've got no problem with the banner  approach, though I think "highly"
might be overstating the  issue.



I agree with the banner approach.