[WikiEN-l] Google faking semantics

[Mathias Schindler]

On 1/3/07, Gurch <matthew.britton at btinternet.com> wrote:

> facts aren't copyrightable. Whether a collection of Wikipedia infoboxes
> can be equated with a collection of facts is another matter, though; if
> that was true, surely it could be argued that the rest of the article is
> also no more than a collection of facts, and hence not subject to copyright?

In case of doubt, only a judge can give you a preliminary answer as
long as there is a superior court.

Mathias