[WikiEN-l] Thousands of *awful* articles on websites

[Oldak Quill]

On 03/01/07, The Cunctator <cunctator at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a perfectly fine, non-biased article that is hurting NOONE by its
> existence and represents real effort by the contributors. Why does it need
> to be deleted? WHY?

I've always thought the underlying justification for unnecessary
deletionism (the deleting of articles which are factually accurate and
verifiable) is elitism. IMO, it detracts from Wikipedia.

-- 
Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)