[WikiEN-l] What makes a good article?

[Steve Bennett]

On 2/28/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Needs a citation
> 2) Would be nice if it had a citation
> 3) Doesn't need a citation.
>
> Remove all of #1 that lacks a citation.

Rather than remove it, can't we just step up our highlighting of
uncited material? I, as a reader, would rather see "The late[1] John
Smith was a member of the Nazi party." with a big red underline or
something indicating that it lacks a source, than not see it at all.

Steve
[1] For living people we should still err on the side of not defaming them.