[WikiEN-l] Scott McCloud on Wikipedia

[Rich Holton]

geni wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86 at comcast.net> wrote:
>> on 2/26/07 10:24 PM, geni at geniice at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Knocking out even 10 of the hyperactives would lead to serious
>>> problems unless you can find replacements (and if you can could you do
>>> so now? The backlogs are getting anoying again).
>>
>> Are you saying that the quantity of the product is more important than the
>> quality of the people? If so, that type of thinking is what has seriously
>> contributed to the cancer in the culture.
> 
> I'm saying that if you want a situation where the maintenance side
> continues to remain in any way shape or form under control you cannot
> afford to follow any course that would result in the loss of the
> hyperactive admins.
> 
> This is simply a description of the current sitution.
> 

How may "hyper-active" admins are there? And if I'm following things 
corrects (and maybe I'm not), it seems that you're assuming that these 
hyperactives are likely candidates for losing their admin status. Am I 
right about that?

-Rich