[WikiEN-l] Moderation on this mailing list

[Ray Saintonge]

Ron Ritzman wrote:

>On 2/21/07, Rich Holton wrote:
>  
>
>>Perhaps I'm misconstruing your point. Is your question rhetorical, or
>>actually seeking information? Are you suggesting that, if a "newbie
>>editor" were to simply walk away, there would be no problem?
>>    
>>
>If the newbie's (or anybody else's) change to an article is reverted
>and he can't make his case in the "talk" phase then yes "walk
>away". There's no consensus for his change. A "dick" phase is not
>going to change that. If he strongly feels that. If he strongly feels
>that the article is being defended in a state that violates policy
>then there are "non dick" paths he can follow such as rfcs or arbcom.
>If he can't get satisfaction there then hey that's life. You can't win
>them all.
>
If nobody answers his comments on the talk page, he has made his case.

Your Kafkaesque universe seems to suggest that the house should play 
with a stacked dick.

Ec