[WikiEN-l] Your comments on wikien-l regarding adminship

[Ray Saintonge]

Thomas Dalton wrote:

>>Choosing a first random batch of 100, and reporting after 3 months about
>>what happened to this group would support the radical concept of basing
>>later choices on facts.  Thus:
>>    1. How many refused the nomination outright? (This group could be
>>immediately replaced by new nominations.)
>>    2. How many went nuts?
>>    3. How many stopped editing within 1 month and within 2 months?
>>    4. How many continued editing without using admin powers?
>>    5. Which admin powers did they use?
>>    6. other questions?
>>    
>>
>6. How many people that didn't get chosen complained loudly about/left
>completely because of/started vandalising in revenge of the unfair way
>admins were chosen?
>
I get the impression that you completely misconceive the idea of 
statistical sampling. 

Ec