[WikiEN-l] Actual data on spoiler warning uses by the public
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Mon Dec 17 08:24:49 UTC 2007
David Gerard wrote:
> On 16/12/2007, joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu <joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu> wrote:
>
>> Instead of accusations from the pro-spoiler side it would be
>> interesting to hear
>> from the anti-spoiler side. David or Guy would either of you object to
>> this sort
>> of compromise?
>>
> I would consider spoiler warnings in plot summaries ridiculous. In
> addition, determining what's a spoiler is basically original research.
One could require that spoiler warnings be verifiable, i.e. they must be
accompanied by a reference to a reliable source that establishes that
the information one is about to read will spoil one's pleasures as much
as the Monty Python secret joke would endanger one's life.
Ec
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list