[WikiEN-l] Actual data on spoiler warning uses by the public

Ray Saintonge saintonge at telus.net
Mon Dec 17 08:24:49 UTC 2007


David Gerard wrote:
> On 16/12/2007, joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu <joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu> wrote:
>   
>> Instead of accusations from the pro-spoiler side it would be
>> interesting to hear
>> from the anti-spoiler side. David or Guy would either of you object to
>> this sort
>> of compromise?
>>     
> I would consider spoiler warnings in plot summaries ridiculous. In
> addition, determining what's a spoiler is basically original research.
One could require that spoiler warnings be verifiable, i.e. they must be 
accompanied by a reference to a reliable source that establishes that 
the information one is about to read will spoil one's pleasures as much 
as the Monty Python secret joke would endanger one's life.

Ec



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list