[WikiEN-l] Neutral Point of View in three words

[geni]

On 14/12/2007, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Teach the controversy" is a phrase that encapsulates NPOV perfectly
> IMO.

It doesn't. Controversy is a POV. See oh most of the archives of this
mailing list (there is a controversy over this matter no there isn't).

> Except it's been popularised by advocates of Intelligent Design
> and is strongly associated with them.
>
> Is there a way to put it into [[WP:NPOV]] that wouldn't seem to be pushing ID?


Describe don't conclude. "When in doubt hide behind a cloud of facts"
probably shouldn't be included but eh can be a useful tactic in some
cases.
-- 
geni