[WikiEN-l] Film article obscene image vandalism?

[Andrew Gray]

On 15/12/2007, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/12/2007, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's been fixed, it was caused by vandalism to this template:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Mojo_title which put the
> > "Image:Vagina-anatomy1" at the top of all pages with that template.
> > The template in question is now protected and the user blocked.
>
> Mmm. I pre-emptively blocked a second template, too.
>
> I wonder if it might be worth reminding the mailing-list about
> transcluded template vandalism and the importance of protecting
> heavily used templates...

...for what it's worth, we have over a thousand templates transcluded
more than 2,800 times - even allowing for duplication and for some not
being "reader-facing", that's still a heck of a lot. Is there any
reason I shouldn't roll through protecting the high-use ones?

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk