[WikiEN-l] Meet the Metz
Ben Yates
ben.louis.yates at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 22:05:33 UTC 2007
Articles like this are getting lots of traffic from digg and other
places, and significantly damaging wikipedia's reputation. The way to
combat that is not to refuse to be interviewed; it's to get the other
side of the story out more effectively. I'm not sure of the best way
to do that, but I don't think the occasional bunker mentality here
helps.
On Dec 7, 2007 2:18 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 5:19 PM, Daniel R. Tobias <dan at tobias.name> wrote:
>
> > Another Cade Metz article on Wikipedia, following in the heels of the
> > last one:
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/
> >
> > <http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l>
>
>
> Daniel;
>
> While I feel it's fine for everyone to have their say, including Bagley, I'm
> somewhat dissapointed that you participated in helping a writer create a
> puff piece that completely dismissed Bagley's long and well documented
> history of dangerous stalking and harrassment activities.
>
> What he's done online makes it completely unsuitable for him to ever edit
> Wikipedia again.
>
> Cade is clearly looking for and finding controversy. The Register thrives
> on that. The reality is rather different. Rendering aid and comfort to
> people who behave sociopathically online is not in the best interests of the
> project.
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
--
Ben Yates
Wikipedia blog - http://wikip.blogspot.com
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list