[WikiEN-l] One alternative

[jayjg]

On Dec 6, 2007 5:21 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/12/2007, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 6, 2007 5:13 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/12/2007, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 6, 2007 4:58 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 06/12/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:55:24 +0000, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>  I know that Durova's sysop bit and public humiliation
> > > > > > >> is not enough for some people, but perhaps they should learn to
> > > > > > >> accept that it's all they are going to get.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >So every copy of the list archive has been destroyed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The list is not archived.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless people keep their own archives which is hardly improbable.
> > > >
> > > > Why would an archive be relevant?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Because archives have this tendency to become public sooner or latter
> > > either through error or deliberately. Mod forms on various discussion
> > > boards tend to confirm this pattern quite frequently.
> >
> > If true, so what? Can you please try to make a coherent point, rather
> > than the usual one or two-line non-sequiturs?
>
> "but perhaps they should learn to accept that it's all they are going to get"
>
> I'm prepared to wait. Eventually we will get usable data rather than
> prevarication.

What prevarication? People have straightforwardly stated that !!'s
block was not co-ordinated on the cyberstalking list. What is unclear?