[WikiEN-l] Balance of sanction [Was: Arbiter involvement on the Durova affair]

[Sean Barrett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ken Arromdee wrote:
> Furthermore, I find it disingenuous that a DMCA notice (which may or may not
> have been sent by Durova, because nobody's willing to say anything) is not
> considered to be a legal threat that violates the No Legal Threats policy.

I am amused by your belief that anyone editing Wikipedia must abandon
all legal recourse.

Since you have explicitly stated that you believe No Legal Threats
prohibits Wikipedians from using the legal system to protect property
rights, the next question would be:

If one Wikipedian physically assaulted another and the victim pressed
charges, would you ban the victim?

- --
 Sean Barrett     | The other side to the Wikipedia that nobody really
 sean at epoptic.com | likes to talk about... is that a large portion of
                  | the content is fairly pornographic, and actually
                  | quite lewd. --Encyclopedia Britannica spokesman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHUZnoGvLnajq5kscRAnFIAKCGzt5EY2V/owL7hoRlfJJG17n/KgCeLF4v
zkEAaEdiGjD7EyrUBvuE7jI=
=YJbk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----