[WikiEN-l] Jayjg is AWOL

[Jimmy Wales]

Nick wrote:
> I'll likely be dismissed as being naive, but if the the discussion concerns
> the material which has been oversighted, rightfully or not, then there's not
> a great deal that can be discussed in public until those with access to the
> logs and material can make a decision as to whether or not the oversight
> tool has been abused, and if so, what impact that's had on anything. If
> there is material that was abusively oversighted and it can be presented in
> public, then I'm sure we'll see it, along with any other relevant
> information.

I am sure it will be widely discussed.  I am going to refrain from 
discussing my own views of it right now because I am still deliberating.

But I am willing to say that some people who have been trolling about 
this case should be ashamed of themselves.  Deeply ashamed.

--Jimbo