[WikiEN-l] Solid, obvious, elegant, workable deadminning criteria? (was No RFAs in progress...)

[David Gerard]

On 23/08/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:

> > If there's ever a need for a larger de-adminning process than that
> > of ArbCom we can discuss it then. As is, there isn't any clear
> > need in any respect.

> We're discussing because there will be a need if we relax adminship
> requirements. We know there isn't a need now.


I'm not entirely convinced there will be significantly more of a need
if RFA is told to quit it with the demands for shrubberies - such a
need that we would need rules in place first, rather than defining
them as the need shows up.

The need hasn't been shown as yet.


- d.