[WikiEN-l] Ugly RFA developing

[Andrew Gray]

On 14/08/07, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wikipedia is not a reliable source (specifically disclaimed); your
> logic, taken to its conclusion, would suggest that we cannot use
> negative incidents in our own edit histories as discussion fodder for
> RFAs.

Didn't we rehash this debate recently? A source can be generally
unreliable and yet still reliable for the purposes of determining what
it itself said...

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk