[WikiEN-l] Self-sensorship, how far should it go?

Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen at shaw.ca
Thu Aug 2 03:44:31 UTC 2007


Rob wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:> >
>>> If they are sensible, then why are they on Wikipedia Review?
>> If I wanted to read discussion and analysis of these allegations about
>> SlimVirgin where else would I go? There's apparently nothing on
>> Wikipedia about it.
> 
> Why should there be anything on Wikipedia about it?  Why would you
> expect an encyclopedia to contain discussion and analysis of the
> absurd allegations of trolls and stalkers?

I'm referring to talk pages. Talk pages aren't part of the encyclopedia,
they're for discussion _about_ the encyclopedia. This obviously falls
under that.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20070801/c0643b5b/attachment.pgp 


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list