[WikiEN-l] Another conflict regarding linking to"attack sites"

[David Gerard]

On 29/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:

> Maybe someone can offer an example of a link to one of these sites
> which is so self-evidently important that the article would be
> incomplete without *that link* (rather than that content cited to a
> print source, say).


Given your Neo-Nazi example ... if we had an article on them, it would
be ridiculous not ot link to them.


- d.