[WikiEN-l] Another conflict regarding linking to "attack sites"

[Oskar Sigvardsson]

On 4/25/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan at tobias.name> wrote:
> Some of the commentary referred to "enforcing the MONGO ArbCom
> decision", and it's a perfect example of why I consider that
> decision, at least the part of it that imposed a ban on linking to
> "attack sites", was a bad idea.

I think that decision is being misunderstood, i really don't think it
was meant in the context of something like a Signpost article (which
is very neutral and has a journalistic purpose). I think it would be a
good thing to ask the arbcom for a clarification in this matter,
whether or not that policy applies to the signpost. I mean, they have
a whole section for stuff like that on WP:RFAR.

--Oskar