[WikiEN-l] Brandt says he might sue even if his bio is taken down!

[Phil Sandifer]

On Apr 24, 2007, at 11:31 AM, James Farrar wrote:

>
> Not strictly accurate. The admin in question decided that "I'm
> unconvinced by the arguments that the sources are reliable" is
> equivalent to "there **is** a consensus that the sources **are not**
> reliable". By the current rules, no consensus would result in status
> quo, i.e. a keep.

True enough. The point remains - it was a shockingly bad close, and a  
shockingly bad DRV.

-Phil