[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia as an "argument sponge"?

[gjzilla at gmail.com]

On 4/24/07, Joseph Reagle <reagle at mit.edu> wrote:
>
> There is a (sort of tongue-in-cheek) commentary of Wikipedia that speaks of
> it and its articles as something like a "debate sponge", or "conflict
> attractor". I have the source somewhere in my bibliography (of thousands of
> entries) but can't find it. Does this sound familiar to anyone?
>
A google search turns up no results.
~~~~