[WikiEN-l] Stupid DRV question

[Rich Holton]

Tony Sidaway wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:57:42 -0400, "Ron Ritzman" <ritzman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why are "keep" closes reviewable on DRV? It seems kind of silly since
>>> if someone really wants an article deleted, he can AFD it again. (and
>>> again and again and again)
>> It's a review of the process.
> 
> That's a common misunderstanding of deletion review, but it's
> incorrect if you take a moment to think about it.  The process by
> which a good article is kept or a bad article is deleted doesn't
> matter.  Only the result matters. 

The end justifies the means?

-Rich