[WikiEN-l] Stupid DRV question

[Anthony]

On 4/16/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It certainly wasn't always that way.  I remember a lot of times that a
> > clearly out-of-process deletion was made and when it was taken to VFU
> > it received a bunch of recommendations to "keep deleted - this article
> > is crap".
>
> VFU and DRV are not the same thing. Just look at the titles - one is
> about undeleting articles, the other is about reviewing deletions. I
> wasn't very active when the move was made from VFU to DRV, but I would
> guess that that was when it became about process and not content.
>
OK then.  I thought it was just a name change, to coincide with the
change from VFD to AFD.

Anthony

> If you believe new information has come to light, then you should
> recreate the article and explain your point of view in the edit
> summary of the creation and on the talk page. If any admin speedies
> the article after that, then you go to the admin noticeboard and I'm
> sure you'll find someone willing to undelete it. (A full DRV is not
> required to undo a speedy deletion.)