[WikiEN-l] (no subject)

[Oldak Quill]

On 09/04/07, Steve Summit <scs at eskimo.com> wrote:
> Jeff Raymond wrote:
> > Unless you think the newspaper is causing harm, too.
>
> Some of them surely do.
>
> > Which, in that case, well...
>
> Earlier today someone said that having Daniel Brand tell us what
> to do was a bad idea.  Here I would say that having the National
> Enquirer tell us what to do (or what we can do) is also a bad idea.

Determining whether an idea is "good" or "bad" (need we be so binary?)
based upon who came up with it is a *bad* idea. Surely the merit of an
idea should depend upon the idea itself?

-- 
Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)