[WikiEN-l] AFD is dead

[Oldak Quill]

On 07/04/07, Oldak Quill <oldakquill at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/04/07, James Farrar <james.farrar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's official: AFD is dead.
> >
> > Because if you don't like the decision, you can always just try again,
> > and keep trying until you get the decision you want.
> >
> > A disgrace.
>
> Don't most review mechanisms work this way? In Wikipedia and the real
> world (examinations)...
>
> There is nothing wrong with this because there is no reason to think
> the standards of measurement would fall (if people were to try again
> and again on RfA without reason, people would come out in solidarity
> against them). Also, people can change and improve so have the right
> to be retested.

Apologies, I though the statement was about RfA for some reason... My
response was to "RfA is dead"

-- 
Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)