[WikiEN-l] Original research or common sense inferral?

[Earle Martin]

On 02/04/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure it's so much "require authorisation" as making the point
> that it *isn't* a shield of arms. It looks like one, it feels like
> one, but it *isn't* one. My understanding is that if you're using it
> as a shield, it has to be authorised; in this case, it isn't, so it's
> simply a pretty and confusing logo.

Well, the school is using it everywhere that it previously used its
traditional shield; that would seem to imply that it is in fact a
shield. I have sent an enquiry to the school and will update the
article when I get a response.


-- 
Earle Martin
            http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/