[WikiEN-l] Original research or common sense inferral?
Guy Chapman aka JzG
guy.chapman at spamcop.net
Mon Apr 2 22:11:06 UTC 2007
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:41:33 -0700, wikipedia2006 at dpbsmith.com wrote:
>Granted this _is_ original research, what exactly is the harm in it?
Missing context, for a start. It's meaningless without a measure of
what proportion of eligible journals it appears in over that period.
Judgment of which are the relevant journals might be an issue...
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list