[WikiEN-l] Original research or common sense inferral?

[Earle Martin]

On 02/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:18:49 -0700, "Seraphim Blade"
> <seraphimbladewikipedia at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Generally, "being right" is not a defense to NOR. NOR helps to
> >preserve relevance and importance of information as well as
> >correctness of it. If no one else has seen fit to investigate this
> >matter or publish that conclusion, why should we be the first? If the
> >guy's that concerned, tell him to suggest the story to a newspaper. If
> >the paper decides it's correct and important enough to publish,
> >there's the source!
>
> I completely agree.

Yes, this is a good call. I will remove the section in question again
(and link to this discussion in the list archives from the talk page).

-- 
Earle Martin
            http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/