[WikiEN-l] Original research or common sense inferral?

[Guy Chapman aka JzG]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:48:52 +0100, "Andrew Gray" <shimgray at gmail.com>
wrote:

>Glancing at the talkpage - if it was an authorised design it would be
>published in X; it's not published in X; ergo unauthorised.

Proof of a negative, of course. 

I tagged it as needing a citation.  We should probably be fine as long
as we restrict ourselves to what is said in reliable secondary
sources.

Guy (JzG)
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG