[WikiEN-l] Semi-solid evidence that process is in fact dangerous to Wikipedia

[geni]

On 9/5/06, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Policy probably. I'm taking about process in general too. There's
> plenty of process that should be culled regularly, per the wisdom of
> [[m:instruction creep]].
>

Do you want to tell the people trying to outlaw the CVU through
guidelines and process this?

>
> Which is precisely what I mean by using it as an example. I still get
> contacted by people upset that "Wikipedia called me a vanity writer,
> what can I do short of taking legal action?" and trying to explain
> that it's a jargon term ... one which the AFD regulars were kindly
> asked not to fucking use for this precise reason. Nuke from orbit,
> rebuild from scratch.
>

What happened to blanking all AFDs?
-- 
geni