[WikiEN-l] good example of overuse of {{fact}}

Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez at gmail.com
Mon Oct 16 21:30:14 UTC 2006

On 10/15/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> geni stated for the record:
> > On 10/15/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
> >>I would recommend that anything like this for which no citation appears
> >>within 7 days be removed or edited in some fashion to remove the need.
> >
> >
> > Would need to be done by bot or we would need a way to clone
> > wikignomes. We don't have the manpower.
> There are many of us who would eagerly remove great swathes of dubious
> {{fact}} if we could be sure that rabid admins wouldn't at best start a
> sterile edit war and at worst try to ban us for "vandalizing" their
> favorite campgrounds.
> - --
>  Sean Barrett     | Therapy is expensive. Popping
>  sean at epoptic.com | bubble wrap is cheap. You choose.
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> iD8DBQFFMl8m/SVOiq2uhHMRAkOGAJ9gBGBqAIH3+sayd1s+4kEZ1iXrCACg4Dm+
> p/RqoSPnDSQuMJVDxNggkvs=
> =ucY+
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

You just have to alert the rabid admins who don't wan't these kind of
unsourced statemets lying around to ban the people who keep adding
them :P

More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list