[WikiEN-l] Fleshlight

[Bryan Derksen]

Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On 10/9/06, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> In light of this, I am going to undelete and list the article for a
>> fourth AfD.
> 
> Phil, it already went up on deletion review and last I looked it was
> majority keep deleted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Fleshlight

A large number of the "keep deleted" votes are using "it was an OFFICE
action by Danny" as a basis, which as it turns out is simply not true. A
lot of the other "keep deleted" votes are using various arguments that
are more appropriate to an AfD instead, and I was under the impression
that DRV is not supposed to be just a re-run of AfD.

A prime example of why this sort of thing should not actually be a
_vote_, IMO. Trying to figure out this DRV's result simply by counting
bold-faced words left standing at the end of an arbitrary deadline makes
no sense here.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20061010/f589fc09/attachment.pgp