[WikiEN-l] Porchesia

[Jake Waskett]

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 15:39 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
> On 03/10/06, Jake Waskett <jake at waskett.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 15:23 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
> 
> > > The bot would have to be semi-auto, i.e. a human would have to look
> > > over the result.
> 
> > What makes you say that?
> 
> 
> (a) people will be happier if there's a human pressing the button (b)
> in a crappily-formatted article, the source info may be easy for a
> human to spot but hard for a robot. I just changed [[Riptides]] to
> take the {{unreferenced}} off it since the ref was given as plain text
> as the last paragraph. (I put that in a more standard format as well.)

Hmm. How about using a custom template, as Carl essentially suggested,
and in addition, make sure that this template explicitly states what has
happened and that it will be reviewed in due course. Also append a
suitable category so that it's very easy for volunteers to find and
review these articles.

Is transparency a good-enough solution?

Jake