[WikiEN-l] "Reliable sources" guideline being treated as absolute policy

[charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com]

"Stephen Bain" wrote
> But I think his point was something in the interface saying
> that completely unsourced articles are likely to be deleted is
> prudent, since everyone agrees that having no sources at all is bad.

What is bad, to look at what WP:RS itself, is having material 'likely to be challenged' without support. I don't agree that a page of college-level calculus, known and uncontroversial for two centuries, should be deleted for the pedantic reason that it isn't referenced. 

Charles

-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information