[WikiEN-l] Fwd: Fwd: Dispute Resolution

[Rob Smith]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rob Smith <nobs03 at gmail.com>
Date: Nov 10, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: Dispute Resolution
To: Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net>


On 11/10/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
>
> I haven't read it in enough detail to follow what you are saying.
>
> Fred
>
>

Synopsis:

Plaintiff filed Mediation Request based upon allegation that defendant
"misrepresented sources".  Two questions were raised:

(1) the correct name to be used for a Federal Agency;

(2) the attributation within that report of the phrase, "The following
were members of the Perlo Group".

After lenghty discussion it was agreed upon by the parties that the
original name defendant used was to be changed from the sucecessor
agency which hosted the Report on its website, to the original defunct
agency (the Report had been release after the original "issuing
agency" had gone defunct).  This was no longer an "issue in dispute"
when Mediation was requested.

The attribution of the phrase, "The following were members of the
Perlo Group" was further complicated by the fact that, while the
texted was footnoted (Footnote 59), the Endnotes to the Agency Report
covering that particular portion of text remained classified, i.e.
were withheld from publication.

Defendant demonstrated through other supporting documents that
Plaintiff's theory of attribution was not viable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff&diff=prev&oldid=23802054

4 days later Plaintiff pursued, and was granted, a Mediation Request
based upon the false premise that (1) the name of the Agency Report
citation was still in dispute (2) presented as "Disputed Text" the
phrase, "The following were members of the Perlo Group", his version
entiely culled from defendants' response to the charge of
"misrepresentation"

http://www.godseye.com/stat/en/r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_mediation_Cberlet_and_Nobs01_Workshop_5bdb.html#2_-_What_text_relating_to_Magdoff_is_being_disputed.3F

In otherwords, there was no dispute. The RfM was not pursued in Good Faith.


There is a mountain of other evidence to support this abuse of
process, and I will happy to detail if so enquired.  Thank you.

nobs01