[WikiEN-l] To: Jimmy Wales - Admin-driven death of Wikipedia
loom91 at yahoo.com
Wed May 31 07:38:19 UTC 2006
On Tue, 30 May 2006 17:45:04 +1000 Mark Gallagher wrote:
>Nonsense. Admins make calls all the time that are recognised by the
>community as necessary, but still make one unpopular with certain
>subsections nonetheless. RfAs are extraordinarily easy to stack, as
>opposers count for more than supporters and the wider community does not
>generally take an interest in them. Requests for adminship tend to
>involve only a very small subset of the community, who, fortunately, are
>usually considered sane (editcountitis notwithstanding); requests for
>confirmation will have all the problems of RfA, with the added drawback
>of being inhabited by trolls and idiots who are too concerned with
>advancing their own agendas to bother learning what admins do and why.
Why are you bringing vote stacking into this? That's a completely different issue. This is not about vote stacking.
>I am not the only person who has noticed that, in your brief time on
>this list, you have rarely posted anything that could not be considered
>"nonsense". I would like to suggest you spend more time on Wikipedia,
>attempting to learn what we're about and how we work, before you try to
>instruct the Wikipedia Grannies in advanced egg-sucking procedures. The
>views of someone ignorant of Wikipedia procedures can be useful, at
>times; fresh eyes, etc., but at others it's damned annoying to see
>someone who doesn't know what he's talking about attempt to lecture us.
>Please, give it a rest, and fill your head instead of this list.
Thank you for your kind suggestions. You'll have to excuse me as I ignore them.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the WikiEN-l