[WikiEN-l] SPAM-LOW: Re: Message: 1 Unblock Request

[Earthhope Action Network]

Adrian,
 Thanks for your honesty and your backup.

 No, I don't want to be one of the mindless drones that says that Wikipedia is perfect and I will never apologize for something I didn't do. I will and have, however, apologized when I said something that I considered wrong.

 Mindless drones is a term that I came up with while still editing on Wikipedia. Yes,. it is the truth and the truth also, is that there are these brain washed people all over the world. 
 They are living breathing examples of the present Orwellian state that the world is in. And the crackdown is about to happen. With the COPE bill and all the evidence I see on the internet, well. WE ARE SO FUCKED.

 take care, Adrian and I do appreciate your concern and your friendship.
 ps Many of my posts do get included in the mailing list.

----------------------------------------
From: "A. K. Me" <akme at internode.on.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 1:38 PM
To: contact at earthhopenetwork.net
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Message: 1 Unblock Request 

I thought that I would say something here.

I have now written 5 messages to the Wikipedia mailing list and so far 
none has been published. I have written to Jimbo Wales, to the 
Wikimedia board, and on talk pages, and I have had my IP addresses 
blocked because I asked them to look in to why I was blocked and whether 
it was fair. They have told me that I am not allowed to ask for anyone 
to question my ban. I have written detailed web pages proving that 
there were pages deleted from history which have perverted the 
"evidence" leading to my block. Administrators have come forward to 
verify that the pages that were deleted from history proves that I was 
being attacked and that I only repeated what they said to me back to 
them. But yet nobody will listen to my appeal. I have never vandalised 
Wikipedia or hurt it in any way. But they say that they will never let 
me back on because I have told so many people that Wikipedia has problems. 

So I think that it is hopeless to talk to people about these things. If 
you want to be unblocked you have to apologise for your actions. You 
have to lie to them and say that you were a bad person, even when you 
did nothing wrong. You have to say that all of the worst administrators 
are really good people. You have to say that Wikipedia is perfect and 
promise never to say anything bad about it ever again.

Do not waste your time with people like this. Prasad is not the enemy, 
nor is anyone else here. They are just mindless drones who follow the 
group think. Somewhere further up the line someone is giving them 
orders. If they do not follow them, then they end up like you and me, 
on the banned list, without a voice. So they accept that they have no 
individuality in return for the privelege of editing Wikipedia.

So the question is this: do you want to be a mindless drone who has lost 
their individuality? Do you want to lie about things and pretend that 
horrible people are good? Or do you want to be true to yourself, as an 
honest individual who is their own person?

The choice is yours.

And if Prasad is an individual, they will not be one on Wikipedia, where 
individuality is frowned upon.

Adrian

Earthhope Action Network wrote:

> Do you mean anything that doesn't agree
> with you or the band of admins and their vigilanat spies that
> control articles and edits?
>
> Incase you haven't noticed Mrs. Laupheimer, I was trying to assist you
> in your efforts.
> * Where was this assistance? and it's not Mrs.*
>
> I hope you realise that your constant complaining-which is the only
> term that can be applied to these
> e-mails- will only result in the list-Administrators blocking your
> message.
> *Complaining Prasad? How about telling the truth. And how is
> this the only term that can be applied..because you said so? You're
> kidding right?
> *
> Taking into account the fact that your talk-page has been protected,
> this mailing-list is perhaps the last medium through which you can 
> express
> your grievances.
> *Wrong, pal. I have a website that is quite well known and quite
> popular. I also have alot of allies both in and out of Wikipedia.
> * *My allies outside of Wiki are journalists, many presidents of
> strong groups, and the general pissed-off (from being pissed-on)
> * *public, i.e. regular lowly oridinary people like myself. Scads of
> them,* *actually.*
>
> Using terms like "vigilant spies" only seves to make you seem
> frivolous. Unless you abandon this attitude you are unlikely to be
> taken seriously.
> *Sorry, but vigilante spies is the only term I can come up with that
> describes these editors. Oh, I am taken seriously by many people on 
> * *Wikipedia, have no fear. Or then again, maybe have fear. The admin
> cabal is doomed to extinction like most tyrannical regimes are. Note:
> notice how Philip Welch defends the Chinese firewall. Jimmy Wales
> went up against Philip on this. My email concerning this was blocked
>
> * I am trying to help you, but unfortunately you do not seem to be in 
> a reciprocative frame of mind.
> *You have a strange idea of helping me. No I'm not reciprocative of *
> *sancitmonious bullcrap.*
> If you would still be
> open to my suggestions I ask that you contact me.
> *Sure.
> */Maggie/*thewolfstar**
> ---
> * Regards,
>
> Prasad.
>
> PS-Incase you haven't noticed I am one of the very few users who is
> showing any interest whatsoever in assisting you.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Prasad J" 
> *Sent*: Saturday, May 20, 2006 11:53 AM
> *To*: "Earthhope Action Network" 
> *Subject*: SPAM-LOW: Re: Message: 1 Unblock Request
>
> Do you mean anything that doesn't agree
> with you or the band of admins and their vigilanat spies that
> control articles and edits?
>
> Incase you haven't noticed Mrs. Laupheimer, I was trying to assist you
> in your efforts. I hope you realise that your constant
> complaining-which is the only term that can be applied to these
> e-mails- will only result in the list-Administrators blocking your
> message. Taking into account the fact that your talk-page has been
> protected, this mailing-list is perhaps the last medium through which
> you can express your grievances. There is ofcourse IRC, but be warned
> that "whiners" are quickly banned from the channels by the moderators
> there. Using terms like "vigilant spies" only seves to make you seem
> frivolous. Unless you abandon this attitude you are unlikely to be
> taken seriously. I am trying to help you, but unfortunately you do not
> seem to be in a reciprocative frame of mind. If you would still be
> open to my suggestions I ask that you contact me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Prasad.
>
> PS-Incase you haven't noticed I am one of the very few users who is
> showing any interest whatsoever in assisting you.
>