[WikiEN-l] blocked for a week for these edits

[abu hamza]

the evidence for shipman eing jewish is greater than the evidence for him 
not being jewish.

shouldnt the question be why are certain posters hell bent on removing this 
background information.

i didn't put the first reference there, it was removed and i put it back 
again

>From: Philip Welch <wikipedia at philwelch.net>
>Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
>Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] blocked for a week for these edits
>Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 05:36:46 -0700
>
>On May 20, 2006, at 2:13 AM, abu hamza wrote:
>
> > hi Philip,
> > like i said, the few references we have on shipmans background
> > claim him to
> > be jewish
>
>Those references are *not reliable*.  It's unacceptable to put
>unreliable information in the wiki, period.
>
>If it was reliably established that he was Jewish, there would be no
>problem. Since it isn't reliably established, reporting that he was
>Jewish, or that he might be Jewish, constitutes anti-Semitism.
>
>Why are you so hell-bent on making this poorly-supported case that he
>is Jewish, anyway?
>
>--
>Philip L. Welch
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search! 
http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview